1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099...
LPA conducted a 10-day visit on 08/22/25 and subsequent visit conducted by LPA Nakagawa on 9/18/25, LPA made observations while touring the facility including the common areas and residents’ rooms were clean and well-organized. However, based on records review, LPA observed at the facility visitor’s log confirmed the presence of reporting party at the facility on both dates. Although, the facility provided their cleaning schedule for residents’ rooms including R1’s room, which is scheduled to be clean on Mondays and Laundry schedule set on Tuesdays. Housekeeping log indicates daily cleaning of waste baskets, mop and sanitize floors, vacuum clean dining room floors, tables and chairs, breakroom and their bathrooms, clean bather/room. Based on confidential interviews with housekeeping staff (S1) confirmed that they have to cover two sections that Saturday 8/9/25 in the afternoon when they were asked by facility medication technician (S2) to go over there and clean a very messy room, S1 observed crumbs on the floor, pads were messy, individual present was demanding with profanity language towards the facility to go around windows against the wall, but S1 limited to vacuum and cleaned the bathroom the most they could do, S1 described as an awkward situation, where they felt animosity and S1 explained that it wasn’t their area and they were just trying to do their best at the moment. During interviews conducted with S2 it was confirmed that they had requested S1 to come and clean the room and bathroom because it was not clean. Also, the facility provided written communication between R1’s responsible party and them including a written statement requested by them to S1, where the above information was described and signed by S1, where the facility administrator requested a meeting to be conducted with housekeeping staff on 8/19/25 indicating that this is not acceptable. LPA conducted confidential interviews on 9/25/25 with an outside agency individual (I1), who corroborated that the last time that they were at the facility on 8/8/25, R1’s room was not fully clean due to R1 experiencing a respiratory illness, they observed used napkins and tissues on the floor, so they discarded them in the garbage can. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Appeal Rights Given. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency (ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment.
Continue on LIC9099C... |