1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continued from LIC9099-C)
Statements from D1, AD and Staff (S1 – S4) indicated that the facility’s procedure is for daycare parents to drop off their child’s water bottles in the facility’s cart during morning drop offs; the cart is moved from inside and outside to ensure daycare children have drinking water available.
D1, AD and Staff (S1 – S4) stated that there is a water fountain as an additional source for water and if a child’s water bottle is not provided, they are given an individual cup with their names written on it to be used. S1 and S2 stated that on the alleged date, C1’s water bottle was not available, but was given an individual cup with their name written on it to be used for the day. In addition, Adult 4 did state there were times when their child did come home with their water bottle low and thirsty; unsure if it was refilled.
Statements from D1, AD and Staff (S1 – S4) have stated that children’s lunch meals are brought from their homes, but if for any reason a meal is not provided, staff would make a meal in the facility’s kitchen. D1, AD and Staff (S1 – S4) further stated that morning and afternoon snacks are provided and from D1, AD and S4, the snacks can consist of chicken nuggets and mac & cheese. Statements from staff (S2 – S4) have stated that daycare children are not forced to eat during lunch periods, but staff would offer a meal at a later time if not eaten during the lunch period.
Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Director, Melissa Terhune. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.
|