1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC 9099)
L1 and S1 stated a middle school aged child (S2) would volunteer at the home and help L1 from time to time with cleaning, snacks, art projects, or accompanying them to the park but has not been present in the facility for a few weeks. L1 continued to state S2 is not used as an assistant, is not on the facility payroll, and just wanted the experience. In addition, L1 and S1 stated S1, not S2, would be L1’s assistant if needed to assist with care and supervision of the daycare children. Interviews conducted by parents (P1-P3) indicated being aware of the middle school aged child volunteering at the home from time to time and have not observed any adult residing in the home other than S1 and A2. Parents and children’s interviews had no concerns with the allegations filed against the facility.
Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Licensee, Christa Smiley. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.
|