1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099...
Therefore, the refund provided to R1’s responsible party should have been from 7/11/24-7/31/24, or at least 7/14/24-7/31/24. However, per review of R1’s account history report, the refund issued was for the period covering 7/21/24-7/31/24. So, based on LPA’s record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached 9099D. *Per LPA interview with Admin additional 7 rent days in question has been refunded to the responsible party as of 1/7/25.**
Complaint alleges facility billed resident's authorized representative after resident's departure from facility for incontinence items. On 5/27/24 R1 was hospitalized and subsequently never returned to Brookdale. During investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s account history report. Review shows that on 7/16/24 R1’s responsible party was billed three [3] charges of $102.50 for the dates of 6/15/24, 7/2/24, and 7/16/24. Per LPA interview with Administrator, these billings were in error and on 1/2/25 Brookdale refunded R1’s responsible party $307.50 for the aforementioned “personal solutions” fees. So, based on LPA’s record review and interview the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached 9099D.
Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties.
Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.
|