1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Upon arrival back to the facility, Administrator was contacted in-person by a Law Enforcement officer utilizing proper identification. An investigation was conducted and based off statements made, and information that was received, the officer determined that the allegation made was false and inconsistent statements were provided by the R1 to the Law Enforcement officer.
LPA interviewed C1, C2, C3 and C4. During the confidential interview with C1, there was inconsistent statements made to LPA. In addition, C1 disclosed to the LPA that he didn’t like the previous Caregiver that was provided by the Regional Center. During this interview, LPA observed a new 1 on 1 Caregiver. LPA interviewed C2, C3 and C4 who reported no concerns at this time and observed to be content in placement. Based on interviews with staff and outside parties/agencies LPA learned that although 1 interviewee reported no concerns with the client and that client presents quietly. C1 is reported to have behavioral challenges. C1 has a history of previous known behaviors.
Based on the interviews that were conducted and the evidence reviewed, the allegation staff violating Personal Rights will be Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was signed by Direct Support Personnel (DSP), Danah Ficher, and emailed to the Facility Administrator, Patrick Seawright. |