1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099C...
In June 2025, facility had a report of suspected theft, but resident (R4) could not remember if they had misplaced the items in question or if they had indeed been stolen. Nevertheless, facility Administrator recorded the instance of missing items in their Resident Theft and Loss Record, as required by regulation.
During investigation, LPA reviewed facility reports to and from law enforcement, facility reports of theft reported to CCL, and facility’s Resident Theft and Loss Record. To the best of LPA’s knowledge and review of documents, facility is found to have been complaint with regulation. Doors to residents rooms all have locking features; locks are present that require a key to open. Facility provides residents with the ability to lock their rooms, ensuring that their personal property can be safely secured. Master keys are kept secure and safeguarded. Additionally, LPA’s investigation of thefts finds that facility maintained compliance with Title 22 regulations in so far as they reported and recorded the instances of theft in compliance with regulation. Facility cannot control the ethical or moral behavior of staff. Upon discovering the identity of the thief, facility immediately terminated S4. Arrest of S4 resulted in S4’s admitting they were the thief behind the previous thefts of R1, R2, R3, and R4. So, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited. |