<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 502700444
Report Date: 11/14/2025
Date Signed: 11/18/2025 11:43:10 AM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
09/29/2025 and conducted by Evaluator Arielle Pascua
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 27-AS-20250929084454
FACILITY NAME:BETHEL ASSISTED LIVINGFACILITY NUMBER:
502700444
ADMINISTRATOR:MELISSA ORELLOFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:2325 & 2345 SCENIC DRTELEPHONE:
(209) 577-1901
CITY:MODESTOSTATE: CAZIP CODE:
95355
CAPACITY:125CENSUS: 115DATE:
11/14/2025
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
09:00 AM
MET WITH:Maria Castillo Padilla TIME COMPLETED:
10:00 AM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Residents developed pressure injuries while in care
Staff allow resident to be left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time
Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed
Staff do not ensure residents medications are properly managed
Licensee does not prevent staff from smoking inside the facility.
Staff are not capable of performing assigned tasks due to intoxication while at the facility
Staff do not follow residents prescribed dietary plans
Staff do not ensure residents personal hygiene needs are being met
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
On 11/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Representative (FDR), Maria Castillo Padilla and explained the purpose of the visit.

Current census was 115. A brief interview with FDA Orello was conducted.
Allegation: Residents developed pressure injuries while in care.
It was alleged that the facility residents developed pressure injuries while in care. During the course of this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted it was denied by facility staff that the residents developed pressure injuries while in care. Facility staff state that care staff conduct daily skin checks on all residents. IIn addition, facility staff state that there were no current residents with pressure injuries. In addition, facility staff state that residents who do develop pressure injuries do get immediate assistance.
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Lisa Rios
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arielle Pascua
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 3
Control Number 27-AS-20250929084454
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
FACILITY NAME: BETHEL ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY NUMBER: 502700444
VISIT DATE: 11/14/2025
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LPA Pascua reviewed facility records which corroborate that there are currently no residents with pressure injuries while in care. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the residents developed pressure injuries while in care.

Allegation: Staff allow resident to be left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time. During the course of this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on interview with facility staff it was denied that residents are left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. In addition, facility staff state that each resident is seen at minimum every 2 hours. Facility staff state that residents are also changed as needed according to their care plans. An interview with 5 residents were conducted. 5 out 5 residents denied being left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that staff allow resident to be left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time.

Allegation: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed

Based on interviews, record reviews and observation it was determined that the residents have been receiving medications as ordered and on time for July 2025-current. Additionally, LPA Pascua observed medications stored at facility to match physician orders and medication dispensing logs. LPA Pascua interviewed 2 staff members, 2 out of 2 staff members stated that medication is given per doctors orders. 2 out of 2 staff members also state that medication logs are audited by the facility care director on a weekly basis to ensure that medication will match with the count of medication available. 2 out of 2 staff membered both reported that they watch residents to ensure that their medication was taken. Record review also revealed that medications are documented appropriately to indicate when medication is taken or refused. Based on facility files LPA Pascua did not observe any substantial evidence that presented that facility staff was not providing medication as prescribed.

Allegation: Licensee does not prevent staff from smoking inside the facility.

It was alleged that the Licensee does not prevent staff from smoking inside the facility. Based on interviews conducted, it was denied that any staff smoke inside the facility. An interview with 5 staff members was conducted. 5 out 5 deny seeing anyone smoke inside the facility have any knowledge of anyone smoking inside. 5 out 5 staff member state that they would not smoke inside the facility. An interview with 5 residents was conducted. 5 out 5 residents deny seeing staff members smoke inside the facility. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the licensee does not prevent staff from smoking inside the facility.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Lisa Rios
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arielle Pascua
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 3
Control Number 27-AS-20250929084454
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
SACRAMENTO SOUTH ASC, 9835 GOETHE ROAD, SUITE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827
FACILITY NAME: BETHEL ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY NUMBER: 502700444
VISIT DATE: 11/14/2025
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Allegation: Staff are not capable of performing assigned tasks due to intoxication while at the facility

It was alleged that the facility staff are not capable of performing assigned tasks due to intoxication while at the facility. Interviews with 5 staff members were conducted, it was denied that any staff have been intoxicated, have come to work intoxicated and have seen anyone intoxicated. An interview with 5 residents was conducted. 5 out 5 residents deny seeing staff members incapable of doing their job due to intoxication. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff are not capable of performing assigned tasks due to intoxication while at the facility.

Allegation: Staff do not follow residents prescribed dietary plans

During the course of this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted, it was denied that staff do not ensure that staff follow resident’s dietary plans. An interview with 2 residents with dietary restrictions were conducted. It was denied by both residents that they do not get their prescribed dietary plans. In addition, it was stated that these plans were implemented and planned with the facility and themselves. A review of the resident’s records shows that the facility and their staff have followed the residents dietary plans and parameters. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that the facility staff do not follow residents prescribed dietary plans.

Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents personal hygiene needs are being met

During the course of this investigation, this LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and residents. Based on interview with facility staff it was denied that staff do not ensure resident’s personal hygiene needs are being met. In addition, facility staff state that each resident is seen at minimum every 2 hours. Facility staff state that residents are also changed as assisted according to their care plans. An interview with 5 residents were conducted. 5 out 5 residents denied that their hygiene needs are not being met. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to prove that facility staff did not ensure residents personal hygiene needs are being met.

As a result of this investigation, this Department found the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated meant that although the allegations may have happened or was valid, there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.

An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Lisa Rios
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Arielle Pascua
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 11/14/2025
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 3 of 3