1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Furthermore, it was stated that R1 was declining in health such as reduced food intake from minimal to zero two weeks prior to the residents death. During this time hospice services increased their visits from once a week to twice a week. An interview with facility staff was conducted, it was denied by 3 facility staff that the facility neglected the resident resulting in their death. In addition, it was stated that there were no concerns regarding the residents while obtaining hospice services. Based on the information gathered, there is not sufficient information to prove that due to staff neglect the resident died.
Based on statements obtained, records review and observations during the investigation process, LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility at the end of this visit.
|