1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deborah Khashe conducted a complaint investigation visit and met with licensee, Sarah Atwood. The purpose of the inspection visit was to deliver the finding for the above allegation. LPA toured the on-limit areas of the facility and 4 children were present and 1 staff present.
During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with licensee, parent, and reporting party. In addition, LPA obtained information pertaining to the allegation and observed the care and supervision of the daycare children. It was alleged that, “Licensee did not prevent day care from being unsanitary.”
Based on interviews with licensee, parent and reporting party, LPA obtained corroborating information from licensee and reporting party. Interviews revealed that licensee’s Family Child Care Home does in fact have a chicken pen with live chicks. Feces from the animals can be seen. Chicken pen is near where children play, watch T.V. and take naps. LPA observed sleeping cots lined up next to chicken pen.
Based on observations and interviews conducted, it was determined that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The following Title 22 Deficiency is being cited on the subsequent 9099-D page.
|