1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Whereas both S1 and S2 confirmed that R1 was resistant to receiving assistance, S1 claims that S2 punched R1 in the left shoulder with a closed fist when R1 displayed resistance, yet S2 claims that they were able to manage R1’s resistance, and held R1 by their clothing each time they attempted to leave the bathroom. S1 alleged that they responded to the abuse by informing S2 that they cannot hit residents. S2 claimed that S1 and S2 did not exchange words, other than S2 asking S1 to obtain clean clothes for R1. S1 alleged that as a result of S2 punching R1, S1 removed R1 from the bathroom and finished cleaning R1 up in the second bathroom. However, S2 claimed that they cleaned up R1 alone, denied that R1 was removed from the bathroom, and stated that they received minimal assistance from S1. Both S1 and S2 had varied accounts as to what transpired once R1 went to bed. S1 and S2 left the facility at approximately 6am on 2/8/2021.
As a part of protocol, Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) conduct daily body checks on residents. There was an incident the morning of 2/7/2021 where R1 sat down too hard on a toilet and the toilet broke. Staff claimed R1 suffered an abrasion on the lower left side of R1's back. Records review confirmed that a body check was done after the incident and the abrasion was noted on the body check form. The alleged abuse took place several hours later, at approximately 1am on 2/8/2021. As a result of being hit by S2, S1 claimed that they observed a bruise on R1's back. The body check completed on 2/8/2021 documents a mark observed on the lower left side of R1's back; however, there is insufficient evidence to verify if R1 sustained additional bruising from the alleged hit from S2 or if the observed abrasion was from the toileting incident from earlier in the day.
Interviews and documentation confirmed that S1 disclosed the alleged abuse to another staff member on 2/14/2021, to which that person informed facility management on 2/14/2021. At that point, a complete body check was conducted on R1 and no injuries were noted. On approximately 2/17/2021, both S1 and S2 wrote statements regarding the incident. S2 was placed on administrative leave, pending a full investigation. Ultimately, S2 denied all claims of physical abuse, but confirmed that the technique of pulling R1 by their clothing was not a technique taught by facility management or any other training protocol. Additional staff revealed varied responses as to how staff assist R1 when R1 has feces in their hand, which included holding R1 by their wrists, verbally redirecting R1 or guiding R1 by placing hands on R1’s shoulders.
A review of R1’s initial Behavioral Support Plan, dated 9/3/2019, notes that staff are instructed to respond to R1's behavior of smearing feces in the following way(s): Use your person or body part to block [R1] from smearing or gaining access to bodily fluids, prompt R1 to stop verbally and provide low level praise and redirect to alternative activity, keep R1 on a rigid restroom schedule, do not leave R1 unattended, address what is bothering R1, and act quickly.
|