1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The LPA did not observe any evidence of the allegation while at the facility. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. Therefore, it is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time
On the allegation " Staff did not provide adequate supervision"; it is the concern of the reporting party that Resident #2 (R2) had fallen out of the recliner in the television room, three (3) times (unknown if any injuries) because there were no staff checking on the residents. No dates were provided for the falls. To investigate the allegation the LPA conducted file review and interviews. A review of the Unusual Injury/Incident reports, dated 01/20/2023, and 03/16/2023 documented that on 01/20/2023 and on 03/15/2023, R2 obtained falls, however during both falls there were care givers present and they were in R2’s bedroom or shower. No other falls were reported to CCL regarding R2 obtaining falls from the facility prior to the complaint received in April of 2023. A review of R2’s admission agreement, dated 11/12/2021, revealed that R2 was not under one-to-one supervision program that is offered as optional items and services for and added rate. Staff interviews revealed that residents are supervised regularly by a caregiver, and that R2 did not require 24-hour supervision, however they would closely monitor R2 due to their seizure disorder. Caregivers make their rounds supervising residents and ensuring the safety of the residents. However, it is standard that residents may be left alone for short periods of time while caregivers are assisting other residents. Staff also reveal that there are always two care givers, one MedTech, and front office staff providing supervision to residents in care. In addition, there is cameras in the common areas including the television room to provide an added source of supervision for staff who is at the front office and are able to look at the cameras. R2’s service coordinator interview revealed that they are not aware of any issues or concerns by or about any of the residents, and that R2’s needs were met. During all the LPA’s visits throughout the investigation, the LPA observed staff making rounds and assisting residents when needed. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. Therefore, it is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued. |