1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed children’s records, staff records, and the center’s policies and procedures. The documentation reviewed did not identify any incidents related to the allegations. During both inspections, LPA observed appropriate staff-to-child ratios and staff providing adequate supervision of children.
Staff interviewed denied the allegations. Staff demonstrated knowledge of mandated reporting requirements, illness and modified diet policies and procedures. Parents interviewed stated they had not observed staff handling children in a rough manner and reported satisfaction with the care provided. Overall, parents expressed that they were satisfied with the care and supervision at the center.
Based on LPA observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted, there was not enough evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited during today’s inspection. A Notice of Site Visit was provided and shall remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were provided, and the report was reviewed. Failure to comply with posting requirements may result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with director Paulina Ortiz. |